Association between Helicobacter pylori infection and platelet count in mice.

Strong evidence for an association between idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP) and Helicobacter pylori (HP) infection has been reported in humans. Chronic ITP is known to be improved by the eradication of HP. The purpose of this study was to reproduce these events by the experimental infection of several strains of mice with HP. BALB/c, C57BL/6, and DBA/2 mice were untreated or orally inoculated with HP. Two months later, platelet counts were compared in samples from HP-infected and noninfected mice. Platelet counts (mean ± SD, × 104 cells/µl) in blood samples from HP-infected BALB/c, C57BL/6, and DBA/2 mice were 102.28 ± 14.71, 99.65 ± 17.00, and 111.57 ± 16.20, respectively; the respective counts from noninfected mice were 121.80 ± 13.30, 104.35 ± 18.20, and 107.84 ± 14.33. A significant difference in platelet counts between HP-infected and noninfected mice was observed in BALB/c mice (P≤0.01) but was not observed in DBA/2 mice, even though the histocompatibility (H)-2 type of the DBA/2 was the same as that of BALB/c mice. According to ELISA results, the optical density value for the anti-HP antibody in HP-infected BALB/c mice was not correlated with the number of platelets (P>0.50). These results suggest that the decrease in platelet count caused by HP infection is not related to antibody titer and histocompatibility-2 type. Experimental infection of BALB/c mice with HP can reproduce the relationship between HP and ITP and serves as a good model to investigate the mechanistic basis for the effectiveness of HP eradication therapy for ITP treatment.

Evaluation of mouse red blood cell and platelet counting with an automated hematology analyzer.

An evaluation of mouse red blood cell (RBC) and platelet (PLT) counting with an automated hematology analyzer was performed with three strains of mice, C57BL/6 (B6), BALB/c (BALB) and DBA/2 (D2). There were no significant differences in RBC and PLT counts between manual and automated optical methods in any of the samples, except for D2 mice. For D2, RBC counts obtained using the manual method were significantly lower than those obtained using the automated optical method (P<0.05), and PLT counts obtained using the manual method were higher than those obtained using the automated optical method (P<0.05). An automated hematology analyzer can be used for RBC and PLT counting; however, an appropriate method should be selected when D2 mice samples are used.